Reviewable document extraction

Extract named fields. Keep uncertainty visible.

Select a folder, name up to eight fields, and process as many as fifty source files sequentially. FileNyani validates model proposals against cited evidence before assigning a trust state.

AI proposes. Evidence determines status. Human review stays separate from the original AI result.

Contract basics · 2 rows
Extraction result

Customer · Notice period · Price

SourceCustomerNotice
agreement-a.pdfFound
Acme Corporation
Needs review
30 days
agreement-b.docxFound
Contoso Limited
Not extracted

Trust states

“Found” has a deliberately high bar.

Exact text must match cited authoritative content selected for that requested field. Otherwise the value remains a candidate for review or is reported as not extracted.

Found

Source-bound value

The proposed value exactly matches field-eligible, cited authoritative evidence from the current source revision.

Needs review

Useful, not authoritative

A candidate exists, but evidence does not satisfy the Found boundary. OCR-only values always stay here.

Not extracted

No accepted proposal

The model supplied no usable value, or could not complete a valid structured response for that field.

Not extracted does not mean absent.

The field may be missing from the bounded evidence, outside the supported source content, or unavailable because the local model did not complete that field.

Turn a document folder into a reviewable table.

No hidden workflow schema or cloud extraction service. You choose the scope, fields, model, and final review decisions.

Open FileNyani →