No silent omissions
Missing comparison-group evidence prevents generation; missing group citations produce a visible warning.
Focused document comparison
Select two files or folders, ask a focused question, and receive a bounded comparison built from evidence retrieved independently from each selected group.
Best for questions such as “How do renewal terms and prices differ?”—not automatic legal redlining.
Acme requires 30 days' notice at CAD 120, while Contoso requires 60 days at CAD 150. S1 S2
Notice period: 30 days · Price: CAD 120
Notice period: 60 days · Price: CAD 150
Balanced evidence
FileNyani searches each comparison root independently, balances the bounded evidence pack, and warns when a selected group is missing evidence or citations.
| Useful request | What FileNyani can establish | What it does not claim |
|---|---|---|
| Compare renewal terms in Acme and Contoso. | A bounded, cited synthesis of retrieved renewal evidence from both groups. | An exhaustive clause-by-clause legal diff. |
| What changed in these two folders? | Deterministic indexed-file inventory, then a request for a useful content focus. | Proof that matching filenames have equal contents. |
| Compare these two explicit files. | A visibly non-exhaustive leading-section overview when the request is generic. | Every textual or semantic change in the documents. |
Honest limits
FileNyani does not calculate similarity percentages, infer exhaustive clause changes, classify legal risk, or prove absence. A precise question produces the most useful comparison.
Missing comparison-group evidence prevents generation; missing group citations produce a visible warning.
Matching paths in two folders are inventory facts, not proof that file contents are identical.
Citations help you inspect the source. They do not turn local model output into legal advice.
Comparison remains part of the same FileNyani scope-and-Ask workflow—there is no separate comparison database or mode.